reservoirs.earth logo
Reservoirs.EARTH
← Reservoir Transparency Index H1 2026

H1 2026 Evaluation

Grenada Reservoir Transparency

F13

Opaque — Ranked #111 out of 167 countries

Coverage18

weight 30%

Data Availability8

weight 20%

Technical Accessibility5

weight 15%

Historical Depth3

weight 13%

Update Frequency5

weight 10%

Methodological Transparency5

weight 8%

Language and Usability70

weight 5%

Primary source evaluated

NAWASA — National Water and Sewerage Authority of Grenada

https://www.nawasa.gd/
✗ No API

Dimension breakdown

Data Availability

20% of total score

8

Grenada has genuine reservoir infrastructure: the Grand Etang Lake (a natural volcanic crater lake used as the primary dry-season water source for southern Grenada), supplemented by four constructed reservoirs — Annandale, Concord, Les Avocat, and Mardi Gras — and 23 surface-water intake facilities managed by NAWASA. Despite this infrastructure, NAWASA publishes no online data dashboard, no reservoir storage levels, and no time series of water availability. During the 2026 dry season emergency (May 2026), NAWASA issued press advisories stating that Grand Etang Lake levels are 'closely monitored' and that some stream production facilities showed deficits of up to 60%, but no actual numerical level data was published on nawasa.gd. The NAWASA website contains annual reports, press releases, legislation, and newsletters, but no operational hydrological data.

Technical Accessibility

15% of total score

5

The NAWASA website (nawasa.gd) is accessible and functional, presenting institutional information in HTML. There is no API, no downloadable data file, and no structured data portal. Occasional water supply advisories are published as text news items, not as machine-readable or structured data. The Grenada Climate Resilience Portal (climateresilience.gov.gd) has a water availability section but contains only general descriptive text, not data.

Coverage

30% of total score

18

Methodology v1.3.0 (capacity-weighted), conservative. Grenada's identified reservoir-type storage totals approximately 3 hm³ — Grand Etang natural crater lake plus the small Annandale, Concord, Les Avocat and Mardi Gras constructed reservoirs. NAWASA issues dry-season press advisories that qualitatively reference Grand Etang and stream-production deficits but publishes no numerical level data. Conservatively, covered capacity (the share addressed by recurring NAWASA press communications, qualitative only) is approximately 0.54 hm³. Coverage = round(100 × 0.54 / 3) ≈ 18.

Historical Depth

13% of total score

3

No historical reservoir storage time series is publicly accessible. NAWASA annual reports (available on nawasa.gd) may reference water production volumes qualitatively but do not include downloadable time-series data on reservoir storage levels. The G-CREWS (Grenada Climate-Resilient Water Sector) project documentation references historical water stress but is a planning document, not a data archive.

Update Frequency

10% of total score

5

NAWASA issues periodic press advisories during dry season crises — the May 2026 advisory being the most recent identified example. These are issued as text statements, not as regular data updates. There is no evidence of a systematic, scheduled publication of reservoir or water supply data at any fixed interval. Updates appear to be event-driven (crisis communication), not routine operational reporting.

Methodological Transparency

8% of total score

5

NAWASA publishes no methodology documentation for how reservoir or lake levels are measured, what instruments are used, or how production deficits are calculated. Press releases reference monitoring activities ('levels NAWASA continues to closely monitor') without disclosing measurement protocols, gauge locations, or data quality standards. The CEO Water Mandate's assessment of Grand Etang Forest Reserve provides third-party ecological context but no NAWASA measurement methodology.

Language and Usability

5% of total score

70

English is Grenada's sole official language and all NAWASA communications, the government portal (gov.gd), and media outlets (NOW Grenada) operate entirely in English. If reservoir data were published, it would be immediately accessible to international researchers. This score reflects the full English-language government environment.

Evaluator notes

Grenada scores low but non-trivially above the structural zeros (FSM, Kiribati) in this assessment group because real reservoir infrastructure exists and the national water authority (NAWASA) operates a functional website that intermittently communicates water supply status. Grand Etang Lake is a genuine natural reservoir of national importance, actively managed as the dry-season supplement to southern Grenada's water supply, and the Annandale, Concord, Les Avocat, and Mardi Gras facilities represent additional constructed storage. The island's 23 surface-water intake facilities make it one of the more infrastructure-rich countries in the Eastern Caribbean. Despite this infrastructure, NAWASA's transparency is minimal in RTI terms. The May 2026 dry-season advisory — during which NAWASA reported production deficits of up to 60% at some treatment plants — was communicated as a text press release, not through any data portal. Water level data is apparently collected (NAWASA references 'monitoring closely'), but it is not disclosed publicly in any numerical or structured form. The G-CREWS (Grenada Climate-Resilient Water Sector) project, supported by GWP, aims to improve water system resilience, which may in time improve institutional data publication practices. Until NAWASA establishes an operational data portal with reservoir levels, the RTI score will remain in the low-F tier.

Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-09-15 · Methodology v1.3.0

Compare with

Other countries with grade F:

ShareXLinkedInWhatsApp
← View all countries