H1 2026 Evaluation
Zimbabwe Reservoir Transparency
C+62Below Average — Ranked #39 out of 167 countries
weight 30%
weight 20%
weight 15%
weight 13%
weight 10%
weight 8%
weight 5%
Primary source evaluated
ZINWA Dam Levels Intelligence Platform + Zambezi River Authority (ZRA)
https://zinwa.co.zw/dam-levels/Dimension breakdown
Data Availability
20% of total score
Scoped to the COVERED subset (~9 major dams: 8 ZINWA-published large dams + Kariba via ZRA). ZINWA publishes fill percentages and aggregate storage volumes for ~154 dams via an interactive web dashboard, but the strict subset above 10 hm³ comprises approximately 8 major reservoirs (Tokwe-Mukosi 1,753 Mm³, Mutirikwi/Kyle 1,586 Mm³, Manyame, Mazvikadei, Mtshabezi, plus key urban supply and irrigation dams). The Zambezi River Authority separately publishes weekly Lake Kariba levels in metres, percent full, and live storage volumes — Kariba is the largest single reservoir by far (~58,600 Mm³ active storage Zimbabwe share). Together these cover the major dam stock. The typical covered reservoir has weekly fill data published. National totals (current storage vs 8,129 Mm³ ZINWA capacity, plus Kariba separately) are stated clearly.
Technical Accessibility
15% of total score
For the COVERED subset: neither ZINWA nor ZRA offers a documented REST API, bulk data download, or machine-readable file export (CSV, JSON, XML). ZINWA's dashboard includes an 'Export Report' button for catchment-level summaries, but individual dam-level data is only accessible through a web interface requiring manual interaction. ZRA publishes Kariba data as HTML tables and embedded charts. No API endpoint, no open data portal, no SPARQL or OGC services for either authority. Programmatic ingestion requires custom web scraping with no guarantee of stability.
Coverage
30% of total score
Conservative estimate — denominator includes ~10,000 small irrigation tanks and rural water storage on commercial and communal land (Zimbabwe has tens of thousands of small earthen dams in commercial farming areas, particularly for cattle and tobacco), private agricultural impoundments, smaller ZINWA-managed dams with inconsistent dashboard inclusion, and uncertainty in capacity figures for older sedimented reservoirs. Methodology v1.3.0 (capacity-weighted). Covered capacity through ZRA (Kariba weekly levels) + ZINWA (~8 of the ~9 other major dams in its dashboard) totals approximately 90,000 hm³. A realistic national denominator including small irrigation tanks and the full ZINWA tail reaches approximately 106,000 hm³. Score = round(100 × 90,000 / 106,000) = 85. Kariba alone represents ~62% of national capacity and is fully publicly reported by ZRA; the conservative discount reflects the well-documented Zimbabwean small-dam tail and partial ZINWA dashboard inclusion.
Historical Depth
13% of total score
MEDIAN years across the ~9 covered major reservoirs: the ZINWA online dashboard is a relatively recent platform; structured machine-accessible historical series for the typical covered reservoir extend back only 2–3 years at most, with no public archive of year-over-year time series beyond the current and prior week shown in the interface. ZRA's Kariba data shows weekly comparisons against the prior year only — the web portal does not expose multi-decade historical archives despite ZRA having collected daily data since Kariba's filling in 1960–1963. Pre-2022 dam data is not systematically accessible online for the covered subset. Academic and FAO sources reference longer Kariba records but these are not served through any official open platform. The median accessible online series is therefore ~2–3 years.
Update Frequency
10% of total score
For the COVERED subset: ZINWA issues weekly dam level bulletins corroborated by dated X/Twitter posts (30 Mar 2026, 5 Jan 2026, 10 Nov 2025) and Facebook updates. The dashboard timestamp shows updates at least every seven days (last confirmed 22 May 2026). ZRA publishes weekly Kariba levels in metres with the most recent entry dated 26 May 2026. Weekly cadence applies to >50% of covered reservoirs.
Methodological Transparency
8% of total score
For the COVERED subset: ZRA provides the clearest methodological context — it documents a 13-station hydrometric network with daily readings, flow measurements at 8 stations, operating bands (475.50–488.50 m), and explanatory press releases on water allocation. ZINWA states the national capacity figure and classifies dams by threshold (critical <50%, full ≥99.9%) but does not publish publicly accessible documentation of bathymetric surveys, stage-storage curves, instrumentation standards, or data quality procedures for its dams. ZINWA annual reports (2022–2024) contain operational summaries rather than open hydrological methodology. No ISO/WMO compliance statements have been identified.
Language and Usability
5% of total score
English is Zimbabwe's official language and the sole language of all ZINWA and ZRA platforms, dashboards, annual reports, press releases, and social media communications. All data labels, unit definitions, and navigation are in English. No multilingual barriers exist for international researchers. Score is not 100 because ZRA is bi-national (Zimbabwe-Zambia) and some operational communications may use local languages internally, but all public-facing Kariba data products are English exclusively.
Evaluator notes
v1.2.0 recalibration (2026-05-29): coverage recomputed as linear share — ZINWA (~8 major dams >10 hm³ in its 154-dam network) + ZRA (Kariba) jointly publish 9 of Zimbabwe's approximately 10 major dams >10 hm³. Coverage = 90% (round(100 × 9/10)), an upward revision from prior 65. The ZINWA dashboard covers a broader 154-dam set including many small dams below the 10 hm³ threshold (rural supply, mining, agricultural reservoirs) — that broader monitoring effort demonstrates strong institutional capacity but is not directly credited under v1.2.0's strict >10 hm³ rule. Historical depth rescored downward to MEDIAN of the covered set (~2–3 years per accessible online dashboard archives), substantially lower than prior 35 which already reflected this gap. Update frequency remains strong (weekly, independently verifiable via timestamped social media). The key structural weaknesses remain (1) absence of any documented REST API or bulk download, (2) very shallow online historical archives despite ZRA holding decades of Kariba data internally, and (3) bifurcated ZINWA-vs-ZRA institutional split. Zimbabwe scores above the sub-Saharan African median due to high coverage of its modest major-dam stock and consistent weekly bulletins, held back by technical accessibility and historical depth weaknesses.
Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-05-29 · Methodology v1.3.0
Compare with
Other countries with grade C+: