reservoirs.earth logo
Reservoirs.EARTH
← Reservoir Transparency Index H1 2026

H1 2026 Evaluation

Singapore Reservoir Transparency

F5

Opaque — Ranked #120 out of 167 countries

Coverage0

weight 30%

Data Availability0

weight 20%

Technical Accessibility0

weight 15%

Historical Depth0

weight 13%

Update Frequency0

weight 10%

Methodological Transparency0

weight 8%

Language and Usability95

weight 5%

Primary source evaluated

data.gov.sg — PUB Open Data (water levels — drains and waterways only) [no reservoir-specific API: country has no reservoirs >10 hm³]

https://data.gov.sg/collections/1396/view
✗ No API

Dimension breakdown

Data Availability

20% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: PUB (Singapore's national water agency) does not publish reservoir storage levels, fill percentages, or volumetric storage data for any of Singapore's 17 reservoirs. The national security posture — five reservoirs are within Singapore Armed Forces restricted zones — and PUB's water security doctrine mean reservoir operational data is classified. What IS published on data.gov.sg: real-time water level sensors at drain and canal monitoring points (for flood management), and historical drinking water quality data (2019–2022). The data.gov.sg open data portal is technically excellent but contains no reservoir storage information. PUB's website and annual Water Quality Report discuss Singapore's water diversification strategy but publish no reservoir fill data.

Technical Accessibility

15% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: Singapore's data.gov.sg platform is technically world-class: documented REST API, real-time JSON endpoints, API keys freely available, excellent documentation. The drain/waterway water level API (api.data.gov.sg/v1/environment/water-level) is a genuine best-practice implementation. However, this infrastructure carries no reservoir storage data — the API returns flood-monitoring sensor readings at drain-side stations, not reservoir fill levels. For reservoir storage specifically, the technical accessibility score is effectively zero; the high 20 score reflects that the API platform is ready to serve such data if PUB chose to publish it.

Coverage

30% of total score

0

v1.3.0 capacity-weighted methodology applied 2026-05-29. Singapore total national reservoir storage capacity ~150 hm³ across 17 reservoirs (Marina, Upper Seletar, Lower Seletar, Kranji, Tengeh, Bedok, Pandan, MacRitchie, Upper/Lower Peirce, Punggol, Serangoon, Jurong Lake, Sarimbun, Poyan, Murai). PUB publishes no storage data, fill percentages, or volumetric data for any reservoir due to national security posture (5 reservoirs within Singapore Armed Forces restricted military zones). COVERED capacity = 0 hm³. coverage = round(100 × 0 / 150) = 0. The data.gov.sg platform publishes ~150 drain/canal flood-monitoring sensors but no reservoir storage.

Historical Depth

13% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: No historical reservoir storage time series is publicly available for Singapore. The data.gov.sg water quality historical dataset covers 2019–2022 for drinking water quality (not storage levels). PUB's annual reports discuss water demand, consumption, and supply sources but do not include historical storage volume charts or tables. Academic literature references PUB reservoir data (catchment yield modelling) but this uses data obtained through institutional collaboration agreements, not from public portals. Effective historical depth for reservoir storage: zero.

Update Frequency

10% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: The drain and waterway water level sensors on data.gov.sg update in near-real-time (approximately 5-minute intervals). However, these are flood management sensors, not reservoir storage gauges. For actual reservoir fill data, there is no public update at any frequency — the data does not exist in the public domain. The 15 score reflects that Singapore's technical infrastructure for real-time data publication is excellent (the drain sensor network proves this), but the specific data product (reservoir storage) is not published.

Methodological Transparency

8% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: PUB publishes general information about reservoir infrastructure: named reservoirs, their locations, total surface area (~100 km² combined catchment area for all 17 reservoirs), and the concept of the 'One Water' integrated water management approach. The Central Water Reclamation Plant and NEWater system are described with capacity figures. However, no stage-volume curves, bathymetric surveys, measurement methodology, or capacity figures for individual reservoirs are published. Singapore's water supply system documentation in PUB's annual reports and sustainability reports is strong on policy but silent on operational reservoir metrics.

Language and Usability

5% of total score

95

All Singapore government data portals, PUB publications, API documentation, and annual reports are in English. Singapore's four official languages are English, Mandarin, Malay, and Tamil, with English being the language of government and administration. data.gov.sg, the PUB website, API documentation, and all related resources are natively English. If reservoir storage data were published, it would be immediately accessible to the international research community without any language barrier.

Evaluator notes

Singapore is a unique and paradoxical case in the RTI: a country with world-class open data infrastructure that publishes essentially zero reservoir storage data. The data.gov.sg platform is technically exemplary — real-time JSON APIs, comprehensive documentation, free access, near-perfect English usability — making Singapore's infrastructure the equal of any country's in terms of API design and developer experience. Yet PUB does not publish reservoir fill levels, storage volumes, or historical trends for any of its 17 reservoirs. The absence reflects a deliberate national security posture. Five of Singapore's reservoirs (Murai, Sarimbun, Poyan, Tengeh, Kranji in the western region) are within Singapore Armed Forces restricted military zones. Singapore's historical water vulnerability — the country's total freshwater storage capacity is approximately 250 million m³ in a territory of 728 km² — combined with its security doctrine means that real-time reservoir storage data has always been treated as sensitive information. PUB's public communications emphasize water security, diversification (desalination, NEWater, catchment, imported), and long-term supply strategy — but never operational storage levels. The data.gov.sg platform does publish water-related data: a 150-point drain and canal water level monitoring network (real-time, for flood management), historical water quality readings (2019–2022), and monthly rainfall data. These all serve legitimate public purposes. The drain level sensors are particularly sophisticated: 5-minute interval updates, REST API, documented metadata. But none of this gives any information about how full the reservoirs are. For RTI purposes, Singapore's low overall score reflects the near-complete absence of reservoir storage data in the public domain. Its high language_usability and moderate technical_accessibility scores acknowledge the excellent underlying platform and the certainty that publication, if it occurred, would be immediately internationally accessible. Singapore's RTI score would transform dramatically — likely into the A tier — if PUB published even a weekly aggregate percentage-full figure for its reservoir system.

Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-05-29 · Methodology v1.3.0

Compare with

Other countries with grade F:

ShareXLinkedInWhatsApp
← View all countries