reservoirs.earth logo
Reservoirs.EARTH
← Reservoir Transparency Index H1 2026

H1 2026 Evaluation

Slovenia Reservoir Transparency

D+45

Poor — Ranked #64 out of 167 countries

Coverage25

weight 30%

Data Availability52

weight 20%

Technical Accessibility28

weight 15%

Historical Depth75

weight 13%

Update Frequency80

weight 10%

Methodological Transparency48

weight 8%

Language and Usability45

weight 5%

Primary source evaluated

ARSO — Agencija RS za okolje (Slovenian Environment Agency), Hydrological Division

https://vode.arso.gov.si
✗ No API

Dimension breakdown

Data Availability

20% of total score

52

ARSO publishes real-time water-level readings (vodostaj) every 30 minutes from automated stations on rivers, reservoir canals, and lake surfaces via the 'Stanje voda' portal. Key reservoirs in the covered subset (Drava cascade: Dravograd, Mariborski Otok, Zlatoličje, Formin, Ptuj, Borl; Sava: Moste; Soča: Most na Soči) are gauged. However, what is published is water elevation (masl), not volumetric storage or fill percentage. No national dashboard translates levels to fill % or volume for the public. The annual Hydrological Yearbook includes mean daily water levels for reservoir stations, but volumetric reservoir storage is not a routinely published open dataset. ENTSO-E 16.1.D weekly aggregate filling data is submitted by ELES for the electricity system but covers only hydropower-relevant storage and has documented year-level gaps.

Technical Accessibility

15% of total score

28

No documented public REST API exists for ARSO hydrological data covering the 9 reservoirs in the covered subset. The 'Stanje voda' portal delivers data as HTML tables and AMP pages; the archive (vode.arso.gov.si/hidarhiv/) provides per-station data downloadable as Excel files by year. The GIS server (gis.arso.gov.si/arcgis/rest/services) runs ArcGIS Server 10.9 but uses token-based security and does not expose hydrological time-series layers openly. The national open-data portal (podatki.gov.si) lists the ARSO surface-water measurement network via an ATOM web-service, but this describes station metadata rather than time-series water levels. Third-party developers have relied on reverse-engineered XML scraping for meteorological data; no equivalent clean programmatic interface exists for reservoir levels. ENTSO-E provides a REST API for the aggregated electricity-sector reservoir data, but this is not a hydrological reservoir-management API.

Coverage

30% of total score

25

Conservative coverage estimation applied 2026-05-29. Of approximately 30 reservoirs above 10 hm³ active capacity in Slovenia, ARSO 'Stanje voda' provides level (masl) for ~7 reservoir stations on the Drava cascade and the upper Sava/Soča, plus 2 additional reservoirs via DEM/HSE submissions to ENTSO-E. Conservative coverage = 25 (down from 30) reflects that the published metric is water elevation rather than volumetric storage, that no national portal translates levels to fill % or storage volume, and that smaller flood-retention and agricultural reservoirs (Šmartinsko, Slivniško, Perniško, Ledavsko, Gajševsko, Vogršček, Klivnik, Mola) receive no public hydrological storage reporting. Run-of-river dominance further limits the operational relevance of public fill data.

Historical Depth

13% of total score

75

Scoped to the 9 covered reservoirs, the ARSO hydrological archive (vode.arso.gov.si/hidarhiv/) holds records going back to the early 20th century for the longest-running gauging stations on the Drava and Sava, with systematic continuous coverage from the 1960s onwards for most reservoir-adjacent stations. Daily water-level series for the major reservoir stations (e.g., HE Formin canal, station 2140) are freely downloadable year by year in tabular form back to at least 2000. The annual Hydrological Yearbook, published continuously, provides mean daily and monthly water-level tables for all active stations including reservoir lakes. The median historical depth across the 9 covered reservoirs is approximately 40 years. The main limitation is that records relate to water elevation not volumetric fill, and some shorter-lived or refurbished reservoir stations have discontinuities.

Update Frequency

10% of total score

80

Automated hydrological stations at the 9 covered reservoirs transmit readings at 30-minute intervals; new data are typically published on the ARSO 'Stanje voda' portal five minutes after each half-hour mark. This sub-hourly refresh is among the better update cadences in Europe for national hydrological portals. ENTSO-E 16.1.D reservoir filling data from ELES is published weekly, conforming to the EU Regulation 543/2013 requirement. The annual Hydrological Yearbook closes within roughly 12–18 months of the reference year. The principal limitation affecting this score is that the high-frequency water-level data is not the same as reservoir fill/storage updates; volumetric data, to the extent it exists, is only implicitly derivable from level-volume curves that are not publicly provided.

Methodological Transparency

8% of total score

48

ARSO's measurement methodology is partially documented in the Hydrological Yearbook prefaces and in agency publications (including a freshwater biodiversity metadata document hosted on freshwaterbiodiversity.eu and the ADO/Eurac Research dataset descriptions), which describe gauging station types, rating curves, and data quality flags. The open-data portal entry for surface-water measurements references the national monitoring network and legal basis. However, reservoir capacity figures, bathymetric surveys, and the level-to-volume conversion curves for the 9 covered reservoirs are not published in open, machine-readable form. There is no unified methodology document in English covering all major reservoirs' operational capacities, dead volumes, and fill-calculation methods. The ARSO note that automated station data has 'provisional and informational significance only' further underscores the absence of formal uncertainty documentation for real-time readings.

Language and Usability

5% of total score

45

ARSO operates a partial English translation of its main portal (arso.gov.si/en/water/ and hydro.si/en/), covering real-time surface-water conditions and water-level pages. The Hydrological Yearbook is published bilingually (Slovenian / English summaries) in some editions but the bulk of data tables and the archive interface at vode.arso.gov.si/hidarhiv/ are entirely in Slovenian. The national open-data portal (podatki.gov.si) is Slovenian-only. No English-language user guide or API documentation for the hydrological data exists. Researchers can access ENTSO-E data fully in English for electricity-sector reservoir data, and some ARSO environmental-indicator pages (kazalci.arso.gov.si/en/) have English versions. Overall, a non-Slovenian researcher can reach the real-time water-level portal but cannot navigate the archive or interpret station metadata without knowledge of Slovenian.

Evaluator notes

Slovenia presents a technically competent but silo-fragmented water-data landscape. Under v1.2.0 strict linear coverage, Slovenia scores 30 — about 9 of an estimated 30 reservoirs above 10 hm³ have public per-reservoir data, with the rest comprising smaller flood-retention and agricultural impoundments that are not part of any operational hydrological reporting. The Slovenian Environment Agency (ARSO) operates a genuine near-real-time hydrological monitoring network with sub-hourly station readings published openly, and a deep historical archive dating back to the early 20th century. These are genuine strengths. The fundamental weakness from a reservoir-transparency standpoint is that what is published is water elevation at gauging stations, not volumetric fill or fill percentage. Slovenia's hydropower system is dominated by run-of-river cascades on the Drava and Sava rivers, where active storage per plant is relatively small, so operational fill-percentage dashboards of the kind maintained by, for example, Norway's NVE or Portugal's SNIRH have never been developed. No public level-to-volume conversion tables exist for the major reservoir lakes, meaning the data needed to compute fill percentage must be independently researched from dam-specific documentation. On the electricity side, ELES submits weekly aggregate hydro reservoir filling to ENTSO-E under Regulation 543/2013 (data view 16.1.D), which is accessible via the ENTSO-E Transparency Platform and its REST API. This provides a partial substitute signal but covers only the subset of storage relevant to electricity dispatch, is aggregated at national level, and has year-level reporting gaps noted in independent platform reviews. The national open-data portal (podatki.gov.si) lists ARSO surface-water measurements with an ATOM service, but this describes monitoring-station metadata rather than time-series storage data. The GIS server at gis.arso.gov.si runs ArcGIS Server behind token-based authentication, limiting programmatic access. No documented open REST API for hydrological time-series exists; third-party access relies on HTML/XML scraping of the portal pages. Slovenia scores in the lower-mid tier of European countries for RTI purposes. The country would materially improve its score by: (1) publishing level-to-volume curves and live fill-percentage calculations for each major reservoir on the ARSO portal; (2) releasing a documented open API (JSON/REST) for the existing real-time station data; (3) making the hydrological archive interface available in English. These are incremental improvements to existing infrastructure rather than new systems, making Slovenia a strong candidate for score improvement in the RTI 2028 cycle.

Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-05-29 · Methodology v1.3.0

Compare with

Other countries with grade D+:

ShareXLinkedInWhatsApp
← View all countries