H1 2026 Evaluation
Sweden Reservoir Transparency
F33Opaque — Ranked #82 out of 167 countries
weight 30%
weight 20%
weight 15%
weight 13%
weight 10%
weight 8%
weight 5%
Primary source evaluated
Svenska kraftnät — Vattenmagasinsstatistik
https://www.svk.se/elforsörjning/sverigeselproduktion/vattenmagasin/Dimension breakdown
Data Availability
20% of total score
For the COVERED subset (~30 individual reservoirs occasionally exposed via Vattenfall, Fortum, Statkraft and SMHI Vattenwebb river-system pages), publication is partial and inconsistent. Svenska kraftnät publishes aggregate weekly storage at the national level and for 4 regional zones, covering ~90% of national hydroelectric capacity in volume terms but with zero per-reservoir granularity. SMHI publishes river discharge through its open data API but does not expose reservoir storage as a managed variable. The handful of individual reservoirs that appear in operator pages typically have only seasonal or annual context rather than continuous storage time series. The typical covered reservoir does not have routine volumetric storage published.
Technical Accessibility
15% of total score
For the COVERED subset, no per-reservoir REST API exists. Svenska kraftnät publishes weekly aggregates as an HTML table and a downloadable Excel/CSV file — machine-readable, but only at national and 4-region aggregate granularity (i.e. it does not technically address the covered individual reservoirs). SMHI's open data API (opendata.smhi.se/apidocs/hydroobs/) covers meteorology and river observations with documented JSON endpoints but explicitly excludes reservoir storage. Raw operational data sits with private hydropower companies that have no data-sharing obligations under current Swedish regulation. For an analyst seeking per-reservoir Swedish storage, the only feasible pathway is direct contact with operators.
Coverage
30% of total score
v1.3.0 capacity-weighted with conservative estimation applied 2026-05-29. Sweden's total hydropower reservoir capacity above 10 hm³ is approximately 33,000 Mm³, concentrated in the large Lapland storage reservoirs (Suorva/Akkajaure, Tjaktjajaure, Satisjaure, Letsi, Stora Lulevatten, Sitasjaure), the mid-Norrland systems (Höljes, Trängslet, Storrösjön) and the major regulated lakes (Vänern, Storsjön, Siljan). Vattenfall and Fortum expose a subset of marquee reservoirs through operator dashboards and routine reporting — partial public reach covers approximately 7,260 Mm³ on a conservative basis. Coverage = round(100 × 7,260 / 33,000) = 22. The conservative downward revision from 30 reflects that even within the covered marquee reservoirs the typical disclosure is sporadic to monthly rather than continuous, that the long tail of small private hydropower reservoirs has no legal obligation to publish, and that Svenska kraftnät's aggregate weekly figure spans ~90% of national storage in GWh terms but provides zero per-reservoir granularity and is excluded from capacity-weighted covered total.
Historical Depth
13% of total score
MEDIAN history for the COVERED subset is approximately 3–5 years of accessible per-reservoir series. Most covered reservoirs lack any continuous public time series; what exists is typically a rolling window of recent operator updates. SMHI river discharge series extend many decades for some gauging stations but are not reservoir storage and are not in the covered population. Svenska kraftnät's aggregate weekly series goes back to ~2002 (20+ years), but that is the MAX for aggregate data — the median covered individual reservoir has no comparable continuous record.
Update Frequency
10% of total score
For the COVERED subset, the typical cadence is sporadic to monthly. Svenska kraftnät updates the national/regional aggregate weekly, but as established under coverage scoring the aggregate is not per-reservoir. Operator pages from Vattenfall, Fortum and Statkraft are updated irregularly. SMHI's hydroobs API updates daily but for river/meteorological variables, not reservoir storage. The typical covered reservoir does not receive a defined update cadence at all.
Methodological Transparency
8% of total score
Svenska kraftnät documents the regional boundaries used for the 4 zones and publishes total capacity per region, enabling percentage-full calculations at the aggregate level. The methodology for aggregating from individual reservoirs to regions is described at high level only; the capacity figures used, the weighting of individual reservoirs and the exact stations included are not published. For the COVERED individual reservoirs, neither stage-storage curves nor operational rule curves are publicly documented. SMHI's hydrology documentation is thorough for river flow but not relevant to reservoir storage. ICOLD entries provide capacity figures for many of the larger Swedish reservoirs but not operational methodology.
Language and Usability
5% of total score
Svenska kraftnät publishes the reservoir statistics page in Swedish only, though the data itself (numbers in a table) is language-agnostic. SMHI's open data API is well-documented in English. Sweden has very high English proficiency nationally, and key energy statistics are often available in English through other channels (e.g., Energimyndigheten annual report, Vattenfall and Fortum group pages). The effective usability for an international researcher is moderate-to-strong — the data can be found and downloaded but requires navigating a Swedish-language interface for the SVK aggregate.
Evaluator notes
Sweden presents a striking gap relative to Norway. Both countries are heavily dependent on hydropower (Norway ~90%, Sweden ~45% of electricity), both have similar regulatory environments and both sit in the Nordic open-data tradition — yet Norway has a purpose-built public API for 490 individual reservoirs while Sweden publishes only 5 aggregate figures with no per-reservoir API. The key structural difference: in Sweden, reservoirs are owned and operated by private companies (Vattenfall, Uniper, Fortum, Statkraft Sweden) that have no legal obligation to publish volumetric storage data. Svenska kraftnät aggregates this data for grid management but does not publish the underlying per-reservoir readings. Under v1.2.0 strict linear coverage, n_covered ≈ 30 of n_total ≈ 120 reservoirs >10 hm³ (audit 2026-05-29 narrowed n_total from a prior 190 that mixed in the broader hydropower-dam population), giving coverage = round(100 × 30/120) = 25. Svenska kraftnät's aggregate weekly bulletin, while excellent in its own right, does not count individual reservoirs as 'covered' under the strict per-reservoir definition. The covered subset consists of a small set of marquee Vattenfall and Fortum dams with operator dashboards or routine media reporting, plus the larger regulated lakes visible through SMHI Vattenwebb's river-system pages. Historical depth scored on the MEDIAN covered reservoir (~3–5 years), not on the 20-year SVK aggregate series (which applies only to the aggregate, not to individual reservoirs). The single highest-impact reform would be a Norwegian-style NVE Magasinstatistikk regime requiring per-reservoir publication of weekly storage by all hydropower operators — Sweden has the institutional capacity and open-data culture to deliver this, but lacks the regulatory mandate.
Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-05-29 · Methodology v1.3.0