reservoirs.earth logo
Reservoirs.EARTH
← Reservoir Transparency Index H1 2026

H1 2026 Evaluation

Netherlands Reservoir Transparency

A88

Excellent — Ranked #2 out of 167 countries

Coverage85

weight 30%

Data Availability90

weight 20%

Technical Accessibility95

weight 15%

Historical Depth85

weight 13%

Update Frequency95

weight 10%

Methodological Transparency80

weight 8%

Language and Usability80

weight 5%

Primary source evaluated

Rijkswaterstaat — Waterinfo / WaterWebservices (DDL)

https://waterinfo.rws.nl
✓ API available

Dimension breakdown

Data Availability

20% of total score

90

Rijkswaterstaat publishes granular, station-level water-level observations for the IJsselmeer/Markermeer system through the Waterinfo portal and the WaterWebservices API, with no registration required. Values are available per measurement station, with current, expected and historical series, and the managed target level (streefpeil, -40 cm NAP in winter) is publicly documented. This is among the most complete public water-level publication regimes in Europe.

Technical Accessibility

15% of total score

95

Rijkswaterstaat operates one of the best-documented open water-data APIs in Europe. The WaterWebservices (DDL) expose HTTP JSON endpoints — OphalenWaarnemingen (historical) and OphalenLaatsteWaarnemingen (latest) — plus a Metadata service and WMS/WFS geoservices, all without an API key. Data is openly licensed (CC0) and documented (rijkswaterstaatdata.nl/waterdata). Machine access to the covered lake-level data is effectively turnkey.

Coverage

30% of total score

85

Treating the IJsselmeer (~3,000 hm³) and Markermeer as the national managed water-storage deposit, essentially the entire strategic freshwater buffer is publicly trackable: Rijkswaterstaat operates water-level stations on both lakes and publishes their height relative to NAP in near-real-time via Waterinfo. The score is held slightly below 100 because the Netherlands manages water as a distributed system (boezem, polder storage, river levels) and not all minor managed storages are individually published as a single capacity-referenced volume.

Historical Depth

13% of total score

85

Rijkswaterstaat maintains long hydrological records for its principal stations — water-level series for the IJsselmeer region and its predecessor Zuiderzee stations extend back well over a century, with continuous digital records covering recent decades. Accessible historical depth for the covered freshwater bodies is excellent, tempered only by the fact that the modern managed-lake configuration dates from the 1932 Afsluitdijk closure.

Update Frequency

10% of total score

95

Waterinfo refreshes station observations in near-real-time (~10-minute cadence) for lake and river water levels, including the IJsselmeer/Markermeer stations and the Afsluitdijk sluice complexes at Den Oever and Kornwerderzand. The covered storage data is therefore continuously updated.

Methodological Transparency

8% of total score

80

Rijkswaterstaat publishes station metadata, the NAP reference datum, measurement methods and data-quality codes through the DDL platform, and the IJsselmeer/Markermeer level-management policy (winter/summer streefpeil and the rationale for the freshwater buffer) is openly documented. Capacity/elevation-volume curves for the lakes are less prominently published than the operational level data, which holds the score below the top band.

Language and Usability

5% of total score

80

Waterinfo and the WaterWebservices documentation are primarily in Dutch but with substantial English documentation (the wm-ws-dl API docs and developer materials are in English), and the portal UI is clear, map-based and high quality. International usability is good though not fully bilingual at every layer.

Evaluator notes

The Netherlands is treated as a rated country in the RTI under an explicit 2026 editorial scope decision: the IJsselmeer (~3,000 hm³) and Markermeer — the managed freshwater lakes impounded behind the Afsluitdijk closure dam (1932) — are counted as the country's national water-storage deposit. They are not classic mountain reservoirs, but they function as the Netherlands' strategic freshwater buffer (zoetwaterbuffer): Rijkswaterstaat actively regulates their level to a defined target (streefpeil, around -40 cm NAP in winter) by releasing water through the Afsluitdijk sluices, exactly the kind of managed storage the index is designed to assess. On transparency, the Netherlands is genuinely world-class. Rijkswaterstaat's Waterinfo portal and the WaterWebservices (DDL) publish near-real-time, station-level water heights relative to NAP for the IJsselmeer/Markermeer system, with an open, CC0-licensed, documented JSON API (OphalenWaarnemingen / OphalenLaatsteWaarnemingen) that needs no registration, plus WMS/WFS geoservices and long historical series. A confirmed measurement station on the lake is Den Oever buiten (OEBU). The high composite grade reflects this open, real-time, well-documented water-storage data infrastructure. (Drinking water itself comes largely from rivers, dune infiltration and groundwater; the rating here is about the transparency of the managed surface-water storage.)

Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-06-01 · Methodology v1.3.0

Compare with

ShareXLinkedInWhatsApp
← View all countries