reservoirs.earth logo
Reservoirs.EARTH
← Reservoir Transparency Index H1 2026

H1 2026 Evaluation

Nepal Reservoir Transparency

F3

Opaque — Ranked #126 out of 167 countries

Coverage0

weight 30%

Data Availability0

weight 20%

Technical Accessibility0

weight 15%

Historical Depth0

weight 13%

Update Frequency0

weight 10%

Methodological Transparency0

weight 8%

Language and Usability62

weight 5%

Primary source evaluated

DHM — Department of Hydrology and Meteorology Nepal

https://dhm.gov.np
✗ No API

Dimension breakdown

Data Availability

20% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: Nepal has virtually one significant storage reservoir: Kulekhani (85.3 Mm³, owned by NEA). No publicly accessible online portal publishes Kulekhani's current storage volume or water level in real time. The National Energy Information System (neis.gov.np/power-plant-storage) has a power-plant-storage page that may reference Kulekhani data but the domain has a broken TLS certificate and is largely inaccessible. News outlets (Kathmandu Post, September 2025) cite water level readings from Kulekhani-I plant management staff directly, not from a public dashboard. DHM's Real Time Stream Flow and River Watch portals publish river gauge water levels nationwide but these are flood-monitoring stations, not reservoir storage data. NEA annual Generation Reports include aggregate energy production by plant but do not publish time-series reservoir storage volumes. There is effectively no operational public data portal for Nepal's reservoir storage.

Technical Accessibility

15% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: DHM's river-watch and realtime-stream pages are publicly accessible without login, displaying HTML tables of water levels across hundreds of river gauge stations. However, there is no documented REST API, no bulk download, and no machine-readable format (CSV/JSON) offered for these data. Historical hydrological data from DHM requires a formal written request with stated purpose, institutional affiliation, and payment of fees — it is not freely downloadable. NEIS has a broken TLS certificate preventing access. NEA publishes annual PDF reports. No open-data API exists for Nepal reservoir storage. The DHM homepage exposes an internal image API endpoint (dhm.gov.np/mfd/api/) but this is not a public data API. The technical access barrier for reservoir-specific data is very high.

Coverage

30% of total score

0

v1.3.0 capacity-weighted: coverage = round(100 × covered_capacity_hm³ / total_national_capacity_hm³). Nepal's total reservoir capacity above 10 hm³ is approximately 85 Mm³, consisting of Kulekhani (85.3 Mm³, operated by NEA, commissioned 1982) — the country's only reservoir-type hydropower scheme. Nepal's developed hydropower fleet of 2,500+ MW is overwhelmingly run-of-river (Upper Tamakoshi, Trishuli, Modi Khola, Chilime) with no meaningful storage. NEA publishes no systematic Kulekhani storage data; NEIS (neis.gov.np/power-plant-storage) has a broken TLS certificate; figures appear only in ad-hoc media articles. Covered capacity = 0 Mm³. Coverage = round(100 × 0 / 85) = 0.

Historical Depth

13% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: DHM has operated hydrometric stations since the 1960s–1970s and maintains an Oracle database of water level and discharge records. Academic studies (e.g., 1986–2015 streamflow analyses using 27 DHM stations) confirm that multi-decade archives exist. However, these records are accessible only through a formal paid data-request procedure, not via free online download. The DHM publication page lists recent flood reports and administrative documents in Nepali, not machine-readable hydrological yearbooks. ICIMOD's regional data repository hosts discharge records for 14 Nepali stations but links appear broken. For Kulekhani specifically, NEA internal records date to 1982 (dam completion) but no machine-readable historical storage time-series is publicly available online.

Update Frequency

10% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: DHM's River Watch and Real Time Stream Flow pages display current-condition water levels at river gauging stations, updated in near-real-time (15-minute telemetry at automated stations). This is commendable for flood early warning. However, these updates cover river gauges, not reservoir storage. For Kulekhani storage data, no scheduled public update cycle exists — the only externally visible data points appear in media articles and come from plant management staff on an ad-hoc basis. NEA annual Generation Reports are published annually with a significant lag (the FY2080 BS report is the latest visible). The score reflects the contrast between DHM's frequent river-level updates and the near-absence of any reservoir storage update mechanism.

Methodological Transparency

8% of total score

0

Coverage is 0 (no national reservoirs >10 hm³ with public data). Quality dimensions for the COVERED subset are therefore 0 by definition. Original notes preserved below: DHM publishes general information about its station network (337 precipitation stations, 154 hydrometric stations) and describes the use of automated telemetry providing 15-minute water level readings. Academic papers co-authored with DHM staff (available on ResearchGate and NepJOL) describe flow rating curves, velocity-area methods, and the transition from manual to automated gauging. The WMO-standard approach to discharge measurement in Nepal's turbulent Himalayan streams is documented in peer-reviewed literature. However, DHM does not publish a formal, standalone, publicly accessible methodology document covering data quality control, validation procedures, or instrument calibration standards on its website. For Kulekhani specifically, the measurement methodology for reservoir level-to-storage conversion is not publicly documented by NEA.

Language and Usability

5% of total score

62

The DHM website (dhm.gov.np) is officially bilingual, offering full English and Nepali versions. The English interface covers river-watch data, real-time stream flow, weather forecasts, and the data request form. NEA publishes annual reports in English. WECS and NEIS also use English in their policy documentation. Nepal's government extensively uses English in its technical and international-facing communications, and the country has a well-educated English-speaking technical community. The score is capped below 70 because the actual reservoir storage data, when visible at all (in media), is sometimes in Nepali-language outlets, and key portals like NEIS have accessibility issues.

Evaluator notes

Nepal's reservoir transparency challenge is fundamentally structural rather than institutional: the country has just one significant storage reservoir, Kulekhani (85.3 Mm³), operated by NEA since 1982. The vast majority of Nepal's 2,500+ MW installed hydropower capacity comes from run-of-river schemes that have no meaningful storage to report. DHM operates an impressive real-time river monitoring network (154 hydrometric stations, 15-minute telemetry) designed for flood early warning — the Bagmati and Koshi basins are particularly well instrumented — but this infrastructure monitors river flow, not reservoir impoundment. When Kulekhani water levels are reported publicly, it is through press statements from Kulekhani-I Hydropower Project management (e.g., Kathmandu Post, September 2025), not through a systematic public data portal. The National Energy Information System (NEIS) at neis.gov.np, developed by WECS, includes a power-plant-storage section that theoretically covers Kulekhani. However, the NEIS domain suffers from a broken TLS certificate as of mid-2026, rendering it inaccessible via standard browsers. Historical data from DHM exists going back to the 1960s across its hydrometric station network, but access requires a formal written request, institutional affiliation, and payment — there is no bulk free download. Nepal's open data portal (opendatanepal.com) and the national hydropower portal (hydro.naxa.com.np) provide static project information rather than operational storage data. Nepal's RTI score would improve substantially with three targeted actions: (1) publishing Kulekhani's daily water level and computed storage volume on a public web page or API — a single reservoir covering 100% of national storage capacity; (2) fixing the NEIS TLS certificate and exposing power-plant-storage data in machine-readable format; and (3) making DHM's historical discharge data freely downloadable without a formal request process, aligning with the open-government aspirations Nepal has articulated since its 2018 federal restructuring.

Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-09-15 · Methodology v1.3.0

Compare with

Other countries with grade F:

ShareXLinkedInWhatsApp
← View all countries