reservoirs.earth logo
Reservoirs.EARTH
← Reservoir Transparency Index H1 2026

H1 2026 Evaluation

Hungary Reservoir Transparency

C-53

Inadequate — Ranked #51 out of 167 countries

Coverage90

weight 30%

Data Availability20

weight 20%

Technical Accessibility30

weight 15%

Historical Depth50

weight 13%

Update Frequency60

weight 10%

Methodological Transparency40

weight 8%

Language and Usability50

weight 5%

Primary source evaluated

OVF / vizugy.hu — National Water Management Portal

https://www.vizugy.hu/
✗ No API

Dimension breakdown

Data Availability

20% of total score

20

Hungary has very limited reservoir infrastructure by European standards due to its flat topography. The primary artificial water body is Lake Tisza (Kisköre Reservoir, ~253 Mm³ gross capacity), plus small irrigation reservoirs (Tiszaroff tározók, Marcali tározó, Tarján tározó). The vizugy.hu portal displays current 24-hour water level data in centimeters at gauge stations and labels a handful of stations as 'tározó' (reservoir), but shows water levels (cm above gauge zero), not storage volumes in million m³. The OVF English-language site provides hydrographic data access via a formal data request form rather than a public dashboard of storage volumes. No public portal shows individual reservoir volumetric storage equivalent to the Povodí portals in Czechia.

Technical Accessibility

15% of total score

30

Hungary's water authority operates a geoportal (geoportal.vizugy.hu) with ArcGIS REST services that provide JSON/geoJSON access to flood gauge station data, including some reservoir gauge stations. The data.vizugy.hu portal (launched publicly in 2024) offers surface water level and discharge data from monitoring stations. However, these services cover river gauge readings, not reservoir volumetric storage. Formal data requests for historical hydrographic data must be submitted through the OVF technical data request form. The ArcGIS REST infrastructure is documented and queryable but does not expose reservoir storage volumes.

Coverage

30% of total score

90

Conservative estimate — denominator includes small Tisza tributary reservoirs (Tiszaroff tározók, Marcali tározó, Tarján tározó), Lake Velence (~33 hm³ regulated), small irrigation tározók on tributaries, and fishpond systems (Hungary has substantial fish-farming impoundments not in the vizugy.hu mainstream publication). Methodology v1.3.0 (capacity-weighted). Covered capacity through vizugy.hu (Kisköre/Lake Tisza water level publication) is ~250 hm³. A realistic national denominator including small impoundment reservoirs, Lake Velence and fishpond/irrigation tározók reaches approximately 280 hm³. Score = round(100 × 250 / 280) = 90. Hungary's near-total reservoir capacity is in Lake Tisza/Kisköre which is publicly reported by water level (not volume); the conservative discount reflects the small but real tail of tributary and irrigation impoundments not in the main publication.

Historical Depth

13% of total score

50

Hungary has a long hydrometric tradition: regular water level monitoring on the Danube began in 1823 (Budapest gauge) and on the Tisza at Szeged in 1833. The National Hydrological Data Archive (OPADAT) managed by OVF archives hydrographic data in accordance with Danube Commission recommendations, with organized centralized collection from the mid-20th century. The data.vizugy.hu platform provides access to this archival time series. However, this deep historical record relates almost entirely to river gauge levels and discharge, not reservoir volumetric storage (which mostly did not exist before Kisköre was built in 1973).

Update Frequency

10% of total score

60

The vizugy.hu portal shows 'aktuális vízállások (24 órás)' — current 24-hour water levels — with timestamps showing hourly resolution. The Hungarian Hydrological Forecast Service processes approximately 40,000 data points daily from ~1,200 meteorological and 700 hydrological stations. Gauge readings at the Kisköre stations are available at hourly-or-better resolution. The drought monitoring system also updates regularly. However, since what is published for the handful of reservoir stations is a water level in cm (not volumetric storage), the operational utility for water storage monitoring is limited regardless of update speed.

Methodological Transparency

8% of total score

40

OVF publishes the total volume (253 Mm³ gross, 132 Mm³ usable) and physical characteristics of Lake Tisza on the vizugy.hu informational page. The OVF English-language website describes the monitoring network architecture, the role of 12 territorial water directorates, and compliance with Danube Commission reporting standards (ICPDR). However, there is no publicly available elevation-volume-area curve, bathymetric survey documentation, or formal methodological note explaining how gauge readings translate to volumetric estimates for reservoir stations.

Language and Usability

5% of total score

50

The OVF main website (ovf.hu) is fully available in English with navigable sections covering hydrographic data, monitoring, water quality, and data requests. The vizugy.hu operational portal is Hungarian-only — the 24-hour water level dashboard, station lists, and graphs are not available in English. The drought monitoring portal (aszalymonitoring.vizugy.hu) provides a full English-language interface. The geoportal ArcGIS services use Hungarian field names. Overall, the English-language content is adequate for understanding the institutional framework but insufficient for actually accessing operational hydrological data.

Evaluator notes

Hungary presents a fundamentally different challenge from most European RTI countries: the data transparency limitation is driven primarily by a structural infrastructure gap rather than institutional opacity. Hungary's extremely flat topography (rivers averaging 2–8 cm/km gradient) means the country has very few true impoundment reservoirs. Lake Tisza (Kisköre, 1973) is the only major artificial lake, and most of Hungary's other water control infrastructure consists of run-of-river weirs (Tiszalök, 12.9 MW) and small irrigation tározók. There is simply very little reservoir storage volume for which transparency would be meaningful. The OVF and vizugy.hu system is credible and operationally active, publishing near-real-time water levels from ~700 hydrological stations with historical records stretching to the 19th century. The 2024 launch of data.vizugy.hu as an open data portal and the existence of ArcGIS REST services at geoportal.vizugy.hu demonstrate a genuine commitment to open data infrastructure. The drought monitoring system includes a few tározó stations with downloadable data. However, none of these systems publish reservoir volumetric storage data in the way that Czechia's Povodí portals or Spain's MITECO/SAIH system do — largely because there is not much volume to report. For RTI purposes, Hungary's low scores in data availability and coverage should be understood as reflecting the physical reality of the country's water infrastructure rather than a failure of transparency policy. A fairer comparison would assess Hungary only against countries with similar flat-river geographies. Hungary is reportedly planning new reservoir construction (e.g., Tisza-Túr, 42 Mm³) to address climate-driven drought vulnerability, and as these come online, the transparency framework (vizugy.hu, data.vizugy.hu) appears capable of accommodating their monitoring.

Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-05-29 · Methodology v1.3.0

Compare with

Other countries with grade C-:

ShareXLinkedInWhatsApp
← View all countries