reservoirs.earth logo
Reservoirs.EARTH
← Reservoir Transparency Index H1 2026

H1 2026 Evaluation

Guatemala Reservoir Transparency

F34

Opaque — Ranked #77 out of 167 countries

Coverage35

weight 30%

Data Availability42

weight 20%

Technical Accessibility14

weight 15%

Historical Depth48

weight 13%

Update Frequency55

weight 10%

Methodological Transparency18

weight 8%

Language and Usability10

weight 5%

Primary source evaluated

MEM — Ministerio de Energía y Minas / CNEE — Comisión Nacional de Energía Eléctrica

https://mem.gob.gt/informe-de-monitoreo-semanal/
✗ No API

Dimension breakdown

Data Availability

20% of total score

42

Chixoy reservoir (INDE, 300 MW, 460 Mm³) effective storage percentage is published weekly by MEM in its 'Informe de Monitoreo Semanal del Sector Energético', and the Amatitlán reservoir level appears in CNEE weekly market monitoring PDFs. However, these are the only two reservoirs with any published storage data. Guatemala has roughly 1,513 MW of installed hydroelectric capacity distributed across scores of private plants; none of those publish storage or inflow data publicly. INSIVUMEH publishes river-level bulletins for natural watercourses but does not report reservoir storage volumes. INDE does not operate its own open data portal. No real-time dashboard exists.

Technical Accessibility

15% of total score

14

All published reservoir data is embedded as charts or tables inside PDF documents — MEM weekly reports and CNEE monthly/annual PDFs. No REST API, no open data endpoint, and no machine-readable download (CSV, JSON, Excel) is offered for reservoir storage data by any Guatemalan public body. The datos.gob.gt open data portal contains no reservoir or hydropower storage datasets. AMM (grid operator) publishes generation statistics via PDF and a Power BI dashboard but does not expose reservoir levels. Direct PDF URLs on mem.gob.gt and cnee.gob.gt return HTTP 403 when accessed programmatically, suggesting bot-blocking. Registration is not formally required, but extracting the data demands manual PDF scraping.

Coverage

30% of total score

35

v1.3.0 capacity-weighted with conservative estimation applied 2026-05-29. Guatemala's total reservoir capacity above 10 hm³ is approximately 3,500 Mm³, including Chixoy (~460 Mm³ gross, operated by INDE/EGEE), the Hidroeléctrica del Río Madre Vieja group, and a long tail of smaller hydropower and irrigation reservoirs. MEM weekly reports cover Chixoy effective storage and CNEE monitoring captures Amatitlán — capacity-weighted covered storage ≈ 1,225 Mm³ on a conservative basis. Coverage = round(100 × 1,225 / 3,500) = 35. The conservative downward revision from 43 reflects that only two reservoirs (Chixoy and Amatitlán) appear in any structured public reporting, that the private hydropower fleet (Xacbal, Aguacapa, Renace I–IV, and dozens of smaller projects representing ~80% of installed capacity) publishes no storage data, that all data is locked in PDFs, and that no per-reservoir disclosure exists for smaller irrigation/water-supply reservoirs.

Historical Depth

13% of total score

48

CNEE weekly market monitoring PDFs appear to have been archived since at least 2010, and the annual CNEE Statistical Compendiums (Compendio Estadístico) cover multi-year series, the 2024 edition and the 2024-2025 edition being the most recent found. Annual MEM monitoring reports cover 2023 and 2024. However, all historical data is locked inside PDF files with no unified longitudinal database for download. Charts of Chixoy effective storage show multiple years of weekly data, suggesting 10–15 years of records exist in aggregate across scattered PDFs, but extracting a continuous machine-readable historical series requires manual effort across hundreds of documents. INSIVUMEH does not publish reservoir-specific historical storage series.

Update Frequency

10% of total score

55

MEM publishes weekly energy sector monitoring reports that include the Chixoy effective storage percentage, making this the most frequent public update cadence found for any Guatemalan reservoir. CNEE also publishes weekly and monthly market monitoring PDFs including the Chixoy and Amatitlán reservoir elevations. However, all updates are PDF-embedded and are not pushed to any live dashboard or data feed. No daily or near-real-time data is publicly accessible. The weekly cadence is a meaningful positive, scored above regional peers that publish only annually, but the purely-PDF delivery and absence of any streaming data channel cap the score.

Methodological Transparency

8% of total score

18

No public document describing how Chixoy or Amatitlán reservoir levels are measured has been found. INDE operates the instrumentation at Chixoy but publishes no sensor specifications, calibration records, datum references, or data-quality protocols online. INSIVUMEH describes its hydrometric network in general terms (river gauging stations) but does not publish protocols for dam-reservoir level monitoring. CNEE references 'nivel de embalse' and 'cota' metrics in its reports but provides no accompanying methodological annex. The 2015 CNEE analysis of El Niño impact on Chixoy generation cited in search results does not appear to contain measurement methodology. Guatemala has no publicly accessible dam-safety monitoring framework documentation equivalent to international best practice.

Language and Usability

5% of total score

10

All reservoir storage data, monitoring reports, statistical compendiums, and hydrological bulletins are published exclusively in Spanish. CNEE maintains a partial English-language homepage (cnee.gob.gt/en/) but its data sections, PDF reports, and monitoring archives are entirely in Spanish. INSIVUMEH, MEM, INDE, AMM, and datos.gob.gt offer no English-language interfaces or translated datasets. No metadata, variable labels, or data dictionaries are available in English. International researchers or investors cannot access Guatemala reservoir data without Spanish-language proficiency.

Evaluator notes

Guatemala occupies a mid-to-low tier on the RTI, with meaningful institutional reporting activity that remains inaccessible by modern open-data standards. The country's energy regulators — primarily MEM and CNEE — do publish weekly PDF reports that include Chixoy reservoir effective storage percentages and Amatitlán water-level cotas, and CNEE archives appear to span at least 15 years back to 2010. This is a genuine positive differentiating Guatemala from fully opaque peers. However, the entire infrastructure is built on PDF delivery with no machine-readable format, no API, and no open data portal hosting. The datos.gob.gt platform contains no reservoir datasets. Coverage is the most acute structural weakness: only two INDE-operated reservoirs (Chixoy and Amatitlán) are represented in public reporting, while the private hydropower fleet — which represents roughly 80% of installed capacity and includes dozens of run-of-river and storage plants — publishes no storage or inflow data. INSIVUMEH monitors river gauging stations and publishes hydrological bulletins for natural watercourses but does not report reservoir storage volumes; its data is therefore relevant for inflow estimation but not for storage transparency. AMM publishes hydroelectric generation aggregates monthly but no reservoir-level data. Methodological transparency is critically absent: INDE operates the instrumentation at Chixoy but no sensor specifications, calibration protocols, datum references, or quality-assurance procedures are publicly documented. Guatemala would need to (1) introduce machine-readable data publication, (2) extend mandatory storage reporting to licensed private operators, and (3) publish formal measurement methodology before reaching the next tier. The weekly reporting cadence at MEM is a solid foundation to build upon, and moving those reports from PDF to a structured open-data format would yield the most immediate RTI score improvement.

Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-09-15 · Methodology v1.3.0

Compare with

Other countries with grade F:

ShareXLinkedInWhatsApp
← View all countries