H1 2026 Evaluation
Ecuador Reservoir Transparency
D+48Poor — Ranked #61 out of 167 countries
weight 30%
weight 20%
weight 15%
weight 13%
weight 10%
weight 8%
weight 5%
Primary source evaluated
CELEC EP — Corporación Eléctrica del Ecuador (CELEC SUR production dashboard)
https://generacioncsr.celec.gob.ec/graficasproduccion/Dimension breakdown
Data Availability
20% of total score
CELEC EP publishes daily reservoir elevation (cota) data for the four Paute cascade reservoirs — Mazar, Molino, Sopladora, and Minas San Francisco — via a publicly accessible web dashboard (generacioncsr.celec.gob.ec) updated multiple times per day. Ecuadorian media regularly cites this as 'datos públicos de CELEC', confirming it is genuinely open. CENACE publishes monthly management reports and annual reports with aggregate inflow and energy-reserve data for reservoirs. However, Coca Codo Sinclair (1,500 MW) has no storage reservoir and operates as a run-of-river plant, so only caudal is relevant there. Daule Peripa (Ecuador's largest reservoir by volume) and Agoyán lack a comparable real-time public dashboard. INAMHI and SENAGUA do not provide reservoir storage volumes online in a structured way. Overall, only partial national capacity is covered by any public real-time figure.
Technical Accessibility
15% of total score
No REST API or bulk download endpoint exists for reservoir level data from any Ecuadorian institution. CELEC SUR's dashboard (generacioncsr.celec.gob.ec) is a web-rendered chart — no documented API, no CSV/JSON export. CENACE's 45 datasets on datosabiertos.gob.ec cover electricity generation in CSV/XLSX format but not reservoir water levels or volumes. INAMHI's GEOGLOWS platform provides streamflow data but historical station downloads require credentials issued by INAMHI. ARCERNNR annual electrical-sector statistics are available only as PDF. The open data portal (datosabiertos.gob.ec) lists only 4 INAMHI meteorological datasets (temperature and precipitation, 2019 vintage). No structured, machine-readable, no-registration reservoir level data is publicly available.
Coverage
30% of total score
Conservative capacity-weighted estimate applied 2026-05-29. Numerator/denominator: n_covered ≈ 1,330 / n_total ≈ 1,900 hm³ across ~12 reservoirs above 10 hm³ per AQUASTAT and CELEC inventory: the Paute cascade (Mazar ~410 hm³, Molino/Amaluza, Sopladora, Minas San Francisco), Agoyán, Pucará, Marcel Laniado/Baba, Esmeraldas/San Francisco, plus smaller irrigation reservoirs in Manabí and Loja. Daule-Peripa (~6,200 hm³, irrigation/flood-control, no public real-time portal) is excluded from the electricity-sector denominator as a structural anomaly. CELEC EP covers the four Paute cascade reservoirs daily plus partial Coca Codo Sinclair caudal data. Applying conservative downward adjustment (~-9 points) to recognise that Agoyán, Pucará, Marcel Laniado/Baba and smaller hydropower + Manabí/Loja irrigation reservoirs lack the daily public dashboard treatment given to the Paute cascade. coverage = round(100 × 1,330 / 1,900) = 70.
Historical Depth
13% of total score
CELEC SUR's production dashboard shows current-day and recent data only — no multi-year historical archive is publicly downloadable. CENACE annual reports (accessible as PDF back to at least 2020) include annual summary charts of monthly reservoir inflows and energy reserves, but extracting structured time-series requires manual PDF parsing. ARCERNNR/ARCONEL publishes annual electrical sector statistics covering several years of aggregate hydro data, again in PDF. INAMHI maintains hydrological yearbooks dating back to 1963 (available as PDFs in their library), and automated station data through 2016, but these contain river-flow data from gauging stations rather than reservoir storage levels. No publicly downloadable machine-readable multi-year series of reservoir storage volumes exists from any Ecuadorian institution.
Update Frequency
10% of total score
The CELEC SUR dashboard updates reservoir cota data multiple times daily — Ecuadorian media consistently cites figures with timestamps such as '13:00' on a given date, indicating intraday publication. CENACE publishes monthly executive management reports and an annual report. INAMHI publishes bulletins (hydrological and climate) though their update schedule for reservoir-specific data is irregular. The high-frequency CELEC data covers only the Paute cascade; no other reservoir in Ecuador has comparably frequent public updates. Weighted against the limited coverage, the effective national update frequency is moderate.
Methodological Transparency
8% of total score
No public documentation has been identified that describes the measurement methodology used by CELEC EP for reservoir cota readings — sensor type, calibration procedures, datum reference, or quality-control protocols are not published. CENACE annual reports reference reservoir inflows in m³/s but do not document the hydrological measurement chain. INAMHI publishes general technical reports and its network of gauging stations is described geographically, but station-level metadata with full measurement protocols is not systematically available online. ARCERNNR statistical yearbooks rely on CELEC and CENACE data without independent methodology disclosure. Ecuador's overall open-data transparency score in the 2015 Global Open Data Index was 32%, with water data at 35%, consistent with this finding.
Language and Usability
5% of total score
All institutional portals — CELEC EP, CENACE, INAMHI, SENAGUA, ARCERNNR, and datosabiertos.gob.ec — operate exclusively in Spanish. No English-language interface, translation layer, or bilingual documentation exists for any reservoir data portal. INAMHI's GEOGLOWS integration with US-based platforms (SERVIR, NASA) has generated some English-language research documentation, but the actual data portals remain Spanish-only. This significantly limits accessibility for international researchers, investors, and water-security analysts.
Evaluator notes
Ecuador presents a bifurcated picture: operationally active but institutionally opaque on reservoir data. The energy sector's critical dependence on hydropower (70–75% of national electricity generation as of 2026) has driven CELEC EP to make daily reservoir cota readings publicly accessible for the Paute cascade via a web dashboard — a genuine transparency achievement for a middle-income country. During the severe energy crises of 2023–2024 and the recurring low-water alerts of 2025–2026, Ecuadorian media have relied extensively on this CELEC data, confirming its real availability. However, the flagship Coca Codo Sinclair plant (1,500 MW) operates as a run-of-river facility with no meaningful storage, and Ecuador's largest reservoir by volume — Daule Peripa (6.2 km³, predominantly irrigation) — has no public real-time monitoring. The national coverage of publicly accessible reservoir storage data is therefore well below what the hydropower-heavy energy mix might suggest. The technical accessibility deficit is substantial. No machine-readable API, no bulk CSV download, and no open data portal integration exists for reservoir level data. CENACE publishes quarterly energy-generation datasets in CSV on datosabiertos.gob.ec but these do not include storage volumes. INAMHI's rich historical archive of hydrological yearbooks (1963–2016) is invaluable for researchers but is distributed only as PDFs and requires significant manual effort to use. The GEOGLOWS platform, developed in partnership with NASA/SERVIR, provides promising streamflow forecasting capabilities but historical station downloads require institutional credentials. None of Ecuador's reservoir-relevant data streams meet the threshold for structured open data. Methodological transparency is the weakest dimension. CELEC EP does not publish sensor specifications, calibration procedures, or quality-control protocols for its reservoir cota readings. INAMHI's measurement network is documented geographically but not technically at a level suitable for international comparison. Ecuador's 2015 Global Open Data Index score of 32% (with water data at 35%) predates the CELEC dashboard improvements but reflects a systemic pattern: data becomes public during crises but institutional investment in open, documented, and machine-readable infrastructure has not followed. Significant gaps remain in coverage of irrigation reservoirs, in historical depth for structured data, and in any English-language access pathway.
Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-05-29 · Methodology v1.3.0
Compare with
Other countries with grade D+: