H1 2026 Evaluation
Bulgaria Reservoir Transparency
C57Weak — Ranked #45 out of 167 countries
weight 30%
weight 20%
weight 15%
weight 13%
weight 10%
weight 8%
weight 5%
Primary source evaluated
MOEW — Ministry of Environment and Water (Daily Water Bulletin / Ежедневен бюлетин за състоянието на водите)
https://www.moew.government.bg/bg/prescentur/byuletini-na-nkc-kum-mosv/vodi/dneven-byuletin/Dimension breakdown
Data Availability
20% of total score
For the COVERED subset (~25 reservoirs from the MOEW 'complex and significant' list that are individually reported, supplemented by NEK hydropower reservoirs), MOEW publishes a daily water status bulletin reporting current storage volume in Mm³ and fill percentage. Daily granularity for the typical covered reservoir places this in the 80-99 band. NIMH additionally publishes daily runoff for 63 hydrometric stations via info.meteo.bg/openData. The MOEW bulletin is HTML/narrative rather than a structured per-reservoir feed, which keeps it from the top band.
Technical Accessibility
15% of total score
For the COVERED subset the dominant access mechanism is the MOEW daily reservoir bulletin published as HTML web pages with no structured download or API endpoint; scraping is technically feasible but undocumented. ENTSO-E Transparency Platform (via ESO Bulgaria) publishes weekly aggregate hydro reservoir filling data (16.1.D) accessible through a documented REST API requiring free registration — but this is aggregate, not per-reservoir. NIMH's info.meteo.bg/openData delivers daily station-level river runoff in CSV/JSON/XML — but for stations, not reservoir volumes. The dominant per-reservoir channel is therefore scrapable HTML, placing this in the 40-59 band.
Coverage
30% of total score
Conservative capacity-weighted estimate applied 2026-05-29. Numerator/denominator: n_covered ≈ 3,000 / n_total ≈ 6,800 hm³ across ~80 large dams >10 hm³ per ICOLD and the national dam register. Strategic reservoirs (Iskar, Koprinka, Kardzhali, Studen Kladenets, Ivaylovgrad, Belmeken, Dospat, Batak) are individually identified in the MOEW daily bulletin and NEK hydropower publications. Applying conservative downward adjustment (~-6 points) to recognise that MOEW + NEK coverage is strategic-only: many of the ~80 large dams are not in the MOEW daily bulletin individually, and ENTSO-E 16.1.D is aggregate-only without per-reservoir disaggregation. The previous estimate of ~25 individually identified reservoirs sits at the optimistic end; the conservative read recognises that ~20 reservoirs receive consistent daily individual identification. coverage = round(100 × 3,000 / 6,800) = 45.
Historical Depth
13% of total score
Median historical depth across covered reservoirs is approximately 3-5 years online. The MOEW daily bulletin online archive appears to cover recent years (at least 2024-2026 visible) and individual reservoir time-series are not directly downloadable beyond the visible web archive. NIMH long-term archives (decades) exist for hydrometric stations and contribute to international networks (DanubeHIS, SeaDataNet, GRDC) but reservoir-specific storage time-series are not in the same machine-readable form. ENTSO-E reservoir filling (16.1.D) provides ~8-10 years of weekly AGGREGATE data, not per-reservoir, so does not lift the per-reservoir median. Sits in the 2-5 years band (40-59).
Update Frequency
10% of total score
MOEW publishes the daily water bulletin every working day for the COVERED subset. Multiple dated bulletins were confirmed for March-April 2026, demonstrating consistent daily publication. NIMH open data updates runoff stations daily. The ENTSO-E 16.1.D dataset updates weekly. Daily cadence for >50% of covered places this in the 80-99 band; not 100 because publication is working days only and the data is one day behind.
Methodological Transparency
8% of total score
Bulgaria's water management framework derives from the EU Water Framework Directive, which mandates River Basin Management Plans with documented methodologies. MOEW has published WFD reports describing monitoring network design and data collection standards. Reservoir capacity figures are officially registered; monthly water-use graphs for complex reservoirs are published by MOEW. The specific methodology for calculating fill percentages in the daily bulletin is not explicitly published alongside the data. ENTSO-E's Manual of Procedures documents the 16.1.D methodology for hydro generation aggregates.
Language and Usability
5% of total score
The MOEW daily water bulletin is published exclusively in Bulgarian (Cyrillic script). The MOEW website has an English section but reservoir-specific data pages are not translated. English-language summaries appear only via BTA (Bulgarian state news agency) press releases. NIMH's hydro.bg portal has English navigation but operational data pages revert to Bulgarian. The ENTSO-E platform (16.1.D) is fully in English but covers only aggregate hydro filling.
Evaluator notes
Recalibrated to methodology v1.2.0 on 2026-05-29. Under the new linear coverage rule Bulgaria's score drops materially: only ~25 reservoirs from the country's ~80 large dams >10 hm³ are individually identifiable in the daily MOEW bulletin (coverage = 31). The bulletin frequently quotes the aggregate '52 complex and significant reservoirs' figure but only a subset of those is published with individual identification. The MOEW aggregate methodology obscures the per-reservoir picture and the basin directorates do not systematically publish individual reservoir storage time-series. For the ~25 reservoirs that ARE individually published, data quality is solid: daily cadence (85), strong reservoir-by-reservoir coverage of the strategic multi-purpose dams (Iskar 673 Mm³, Koprinka, Kardzhali, Studen Kladenets, Ivaylovgrad), and methodological grounding in EU Water Framework Directive obligations. The two principal constraints are (1) the dominant per-reservoir channel is HTML/scrapable rather than API/structured, and (2) Bulgarian-only delivery on the operational portal — international researchers have to route through BTA press summaries or rely on ENTSO-E aggregate. The single highest-impact improvement would be expanding the MOEW daily bulletin from ~25 individually identified reservoirs to all ~80 large dams (which would lift coverage from 31 to ~75 and would alone add ~13 points to the total). The second highest would be publishing the bulletin as a structured CSV/JSON with stable per-reservoir IDs, which would lift technical accessibility from 45 to ~75. Both improvements together would put Bulgaria solidly in the B/B+ tier rather than its current C/C- territory.
Evaluated by Jaime Delgado · 2026-05-29 · Methodology v1.3.0
Compare with
Other countries with grade C: